Government Operations Committee
August 26, 2008
Minutes
Councilors: Hawes, Wheeler, D’Errico,
Staff: Barrett, Farrar, Gastia, Higgins,
Nicklas, Cammack
1.
Voluntary Insurance Benefits
Farrar introduced Donna Ingraham,
Account Representative with HRH/Dunlap of
2.
Ordinance Amendment -- Emergency Radio Amplification
Gastia said the City’s public safety personnel has
experienced difficulty in communicating with dispatch and others when they are
inside large buildings, particularly those that have a lot of concrete and
steel construction. He noted the Bangor
Mall and
Barrett noted that Nicklas provided copies of a revised
version than that provided with the agenda. Particularly in the case of existing
buildings, Barrett said that the revised version clarifies when they would be
required to upgrade with the system to make certain that the City was not being
retroactive, to state clear standards at what level of investment in an
existing building or an expansion of an existing building the owner would be
required to install the system. Gastia said
one of the reasons this came to light was that the new Hollywood Slots building
did not install a bidirectional system and he understands that the new Court
System building will not include the system.
He is hoping to further communicate with the Court System hoping they
will voluntarily participate.
Higgins said that since 2004 the Department has been
working on its communications systems for first responders. Through grant monies, the system has been
upgraded and is currently the best it has ever been. There are still issues with larger
buildings. If the amendment to the
Ordinance is not put in place, in a few years the Department will be back to where
it originally was with the communication problems. It is important to the safety of the
firefighters. He noted that communities
in
If this Ordinance is adopted by the
Council, Wheeler asked if it would be
retroactive.
Gastia said no. Cammack said
their intent is to approach the two businesses, if the ordinance is adopted, to
see if they can be convinced to be in everyone’s best interest to work it out. Wheeler asked if there is a possible problem
of interference by the new system and the UHF systems already in place in some
of the larger facilities. Higgins said no
and that the problem is that this is relatively new technology and lack of
awareness. Public safety frequencies are
separate from those assigned to other users.
Gastia said he has worked with the engineers at EMMC regarding
interference concerns. At EMMC there is
the ability to them to use their radio communications equipment if they chose
to go on the same platform and use that system for them to speak outside of
their structure. It would require
modifications on their part.
Responding to Hawes, Gastia said the Court structure would
add this system at this point. Heitmann
is attempting to contact the Court system to see if they would be willing to
install the system. Gastia thinks they
understand the need for the system given the amount of law enforcement
officials in the building on a daily basis.
Higgins said that the new WalMart would not be
required to install the system because they are under construction but it would
certainly be a structure that should do so.
Barrett mentioned the possibility of the Airport’s terminal building and
Cammack said he understands the need for a square footage
cost but he said it would be very difficult.
To do the Bangor Mall, the cost was $47,000. He isn’t certain of the Mall’s square
footage, $45,000 for EMMC and an estimate of $70,000 for Hollywood Slots
because they required a special shielded cable to meet their specifications. They did not opt to go with the system. Gastia said the expense for the Mall and EMMC
were after construction costs, which requires more work. He agreed with Barrett that you don’t know
what is needed with new construction until the facility is in place and he
prefers to err on the side of caution but realizing that cost is a factor. Higgins said that the canopy of the City
grows with newer and larger buildings it could interfere with
communication.
Hawes said that the Ordinance in itself is a public safety
issue but she questioned what gives the City teeth for existing structures that
need the system. Barrett said those
building would not be covered by the Ordinance until a substantial expansion or
renovation is done. The City will work
with businesses on the educational front.
In terms of the installation process in an existing
structure, Wheeler asked if it is disruptive.
Gastia said his Department worked with each facility and at the Mall the
work was done in off hours. The
installation was done within a week. It
worked out very well with EMMC as well.
Existing chase ways were used to run the coaxial wire.
Hawes noted that this can be sent forward to Council for
first reading and when it comes back the square footage and further information
could be provided at that point. Wheeler
agreed. A motion was made and seconded
to move the item to Council for first reading and referral at the September 8th
Council Meeting. Higgins said there are
various municipalities that have made the ordinance retroactive. Barrett said that if the Council is interested
in making this retroactive that it raises other questions; i.e., buildings that
would be covered. Wheeler asked if state
owned buildings are subject to local codes and ordinances. Barrett said they
are now but the state can exemption itself from zoning. If it is retroactive, Wheeler agreed with D’Errico that some sort of a tax rebate should be provided
to the business. Barrett said this would
apply to some City buildings--City Hall, the new Police Department, Airport
buildings, Auditorium/Civic Center, some of the school facilities. If the Council is interested, staff needs to
put together a list of buildings that would be affected. Higgins said it is not their intent to go
retroactive but to maintain the integrity of the current system. He is more concerned that some of the new
larger buildings could be identified and the Department would work with
them. Responding to D’Errico,
Cammack said that hotels are a high risk.
D’Errico noted the two new hotel
structures. Hawes said she would like
the information for their next discussion regarding new or partially completed
construction with no Certificate of Occupancy issued as well as the square
footage cost information as best as possible.
If this is going to possibly affect buildings current under
construction, Hawes suggested that the owners be notified of the upcoming
discussions and to invite them to the meeting. Hawes feels that in good conscience that some
of the newer buildings will come on board.
Cammack said that he will also asked representatives of the
Mall and EMMC to also attend to discuss their installation process.
Wheeler withdrew his earlier question and suggested that it
be discussed at a later point with the City Manager.
Committee adjourned at 5:30 pm.